

In RSSB the the physical Satguru is meant to be omnisicient.but there is plenty of evidence on the contrary though a disciple would simply regard this as as test of faith, and/or come out with some kind of rationalization. What is required is a database on which to draw upon made up of anonymous Satsangis who could give attempted descriptions of their experiences. However, this is unlikely to happen unless there is a serious power struggle at the top.įurthermore, many people have complained that nothing is experienced in meditation after many years of practice. Such spiritual elections have already notably happened in Dayalbagh. Ideally, Gurinder should step down from his position of Master, and possibly have set up a number of "Satgurus" who would be elected by advanced Satsangis. It does need to radically reduce its size. Indeed, the whole organization has become absurdly big, and "bloated". Ref With the Three Masters, by Munshi Ram pedition (minor editing)īut the question is this? Why should an "imperfect" Master exist? The answer may be that the Mauj (or Divine Will) of God wants to "wind up" RSSB for reasons best known to Itself. “.If the Guru himself has not reached Satlok, but his Guru is perfect or, like Swami Ji Maharaj, has come straight from Anami(the Nameless Region, the "highest" of all Regions),he will take his disciples up to the stage he has attained himself, and beyond that his Guru, or his Gurus Guru, or Swami Ji Maharaj Himself will take them. Whether Gurinder is perfect, or not probably does not necessarily matter as the following extract reveals, and is believed to have been said by Sawan Singh.

Admitedly, I am a bit of a Radhasoami apologist because I feel there is more than meets the eye. What I present here are three ways of looking at this subject with an open mind. But it must be remembered that the physical Master like many incarnations in India is seen as the physical manifestation of God. Does it all matter? In one sense, it does as revealed in Brian Hines two articles. The question which I am concerned here is this. But is a "runway" a best way of using money.possbily money which originated from the Satsang itself.? When I was with friends at a home Satsang in which there was mention about the construction for a runway of sorts at Haynes Park so that Gurinder could land his aircraft! However, this came to nothing.probably due to the bureaucratic local planning authorities!! Admitedly, I did not think much of this.and everyone seemed to regard it as amusing. "How do you know that I am not a fraud?" My Satsangi, and Non-Satsangi friends found that amusing.Īnother "red flag" was raised. Indeed, when he became the new Satguru for RSSB he reportedly asked a certain question a few times. The English teacher then asked me what sort of power we were dealing with? This was somewhat disturbing at the time as I did have some doubts about Gurinder which unfortunately are now bourne out by the revelations at Brian Hines Blog. He revealed that Gurinder (shortly before Charan passed on) had done some kind of business "mistake," but the Dera Management sent a message insisting that he was a Perfect Master. Sometime after my initiation into the Radhasoami Satsang Beas, or RSSB someone said to be an English teacher who worked in Spain came out with a claim. The Bloggers comments on the two articles by Brian Hines.
